This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR/WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR vs TRY_CATCH_EXPR
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
- Subject: Re: CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR/WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR vs TRY_CATCH_EXPR
- From: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 01:34:53 -0700 (MST)
- CC: egcs at cygnus dot com, gcc2 at gnu dot org
- References: <9812212202.AA20816@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: rms at gnu dot org
Unfortuantely, I no longer remember the
details, but the problem occurs in a front end that uses cleanup items
(not via tree cods but via calls to expand_decl_cleanup) but does not
call the recently-added EH functions. Such front ends will blow up
(if I remember correctly) without my change.
I see.
In this case, I think I don't have an opinion on the question of which
way should be the default.