This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86


>>>>> "Toon" == Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> writes:

 >> I haven't followed all this, but am somewhat bemused 
 >> by it.

 Toon> I must say that I am *not* amused.  

Me neither.  _Be_mused, baffled.

 Toon> This discussion goes into a direction that will leave us with a
 Toon> compiler that, although numerical-politically correct, will be
 Toon> generating such slow code as to be totally unuseable.

I don't know whether it's any more than numerical political
correctness.  I've been flamed several times for querying claims
apropos both x86 and Alpha that LAPACK (specifically, possibly other
things) requires strict IEEE double behaviour.  The flamers produced
no evidence, but I guess it might still be so and that I ought to ask
the LA pack themselves.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]