Re: bug in egcs with C++?

[Martin von Loewis <martin at mira dot isdn dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>]

> Sorry - wrong.  I -do- understand.  My C++ experience may be 5+ years out
> of date but the code I've been writing is not unusual except perhaps in
> the number of virtual objects.  I -do- have many objects with
> unimplemented (=0) functions but they are never referred to in such a
> way to cause this.

Maybe this is the cause of the problem. An unimplemented function does
NOT look like that:

class Foo{
  virtual void bar()=0;
};

This is called a pure virtual function, instead. What we mean by
unimplemented functions are those:

class Bar{
  virtual void foo();
};

with no definition of Bar::foo in any source file.

Hope this helps,
Martin