This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: asm changes? [Was: Re: flow.c bugfix ]



  In message <199812040828.IAA11113@phal.cygnus.co.uk>you write:
  > > '+' means read/write.  '&' has meant earlyclobber.  I think earlyclobber 
  > more
  > > closely matches the semantics they need.
  > 
  > So how about "+&r" ?
Then why bother with the "+" at all?  I don't see what additional information
to the compiler or syntatic sugar to the user that the  "+" provides over and
above having "&".

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]