This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: asm changes? [Was: Re: flow.c bugfix ]



  In message <199812040804.IAA11083@phal.cygnus.co.uk>you write:
  > > Basically they need a more intuitive way to say "this value must be in a 
  > > register at the start of this asm and the register will be clobbered
  > > unpredictably within the asm".
  > 
  > So why not use "+r" ?
'+' means read/write.  '&' has meant earlyclobber.  I think earlyclobber more
closely matches the semantics they need.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]