This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-announce mailing list
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: egcs-announce mailing list
- From: Marc Lehmann <pcg at goof dot com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 05:06:24 +0100
- References: <25862.912302037@hurl.cygnus.com> <Pine.GSO.4.05.9811291628260.16972-100000@alphard.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 04:31:41PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > The egcs-announce list now lives on the egcs machine
> > (egcs-announce@egcs.cygnus.com).
>
> Mailing-List: contact egcs-announce-help@egcs.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
> Delivered-To: mailing list egcs-announce@egcs.cygnus.com
>
> Is there any specific reason to abandon the Sender: header in favor of
> the the Mailing-List: and Delivered-To: headers? (Actually I believe that
The Delivered-To header serves a different purpose, and only has local
significance (and should not really go over the network, btw, as it may
confuse people's mail filters!)
I, too, think the Sender: header should be usable for mail filtering.
> these are not RFC compliant, though I haven't check this yet.)
They are "hardly" compliant, i.e. these headers "should not" be added,
instead they should be prefixed with "X-", but both headers are
quasi-standard, and are not strictly forbidden.
In case anybody wants to know: the Delivered-To: header is a very useful
thing (think multidrop mailboxes!) for people reading their mail through
pop3 or other protocols without envelope information like pop3 or unix mail
folders. Sendmail is incapable of adding this header without hacking, btw...
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@goof.com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|