This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES
- To: law at cygnus dot com, m dot hayes at elec dot canterbury dot ac dot nz
- Subject: Re: SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES
- From: mrs at wrs dot com (Mike Stump)
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 08:08:29 -0800
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 22:58:32 -0700
> From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
> > With Bernd's changes to reload, is SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES required,
>
> I suspect it is no longer required.
> In fact, one of my todos is to remove the SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES
> define for the mn102 and mn103 ports and see what happens :-)
Since x86 defines it, and since we have a bizzilion people with x86,
would it make sense for people to try it out on x86 and inspect code
differences and do performace reviews on the various code they have?!