This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Checkin Policy
- To: amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk (Joern Rennecke)
- Subject: Re: Checkin Policy
- From: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 08:50:35 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: mark at markmitchell dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com
>
> > So, I suggest that you take the time to run the C++ testsuite as
> > well. If you notice the C++ test results changing over time, please
> > complain; that will encourage the C++ developers (myself included) to
> > make sure we're not breaking the testsuite.
>
> That's what I'm seeing right now. It seems that some things just don't
> work with libc5 ???
>
> /lib:
> libc.so.4 => libc.so.4.7.6
> libm.so.5 => libm.so.5.0.9
> libncurses.so.3.0 => libncurses.so.3.0.970515
> libncurses.so.1.9 => libncurses.so.1.9.7a
> libc.so.5 => libc.so.5.4.33
> ld-linux.so.1.7.14 => ld-linux.so.1.7.14
> ld-linux.so.1 => ld-linux.so.1.9.6
> libdl.so.1 => libdl.so.1.9.6
>
Your setup is kind of old. Please get binutils 2.9.1.0.15/2.9.1.0.16
and libc 5.4.46. Otherwise, many c++ tests won't pass. If you still
have problems after that, I will look into it.
BTW, I no longer have libc 5 machines. But I will cross-compile from
glibc 2 to libc 5. I don't expect there should be major differences
between the test results.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)