This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Sun compares their compiler tools to GNU tools
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Sun compares their compiler tools to GNU tools
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:12:53 -0800
- Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at dm dot cobaltmicro dot com>, mrs at wrs dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com, howell at cs dot stanford dot edu
- References: <19981110122738.A11066@dot.cygnus.com> <Pine.GSO.4.05.9811102135360.5864-100000@markab.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
- Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 09:40:42PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> `/usr/platform/sun4u/sbin/prtdiag -v` should do the job:
Ok, here's the output for lisa then,
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4u Sun Ultra 1 SBus \
(UltraSPARC 167MHz)
System clock frequency: 84 MHz
Memory size: 128 Megabytes
CPU Units: Frequency Cache-Size Version
A: MHz MB Impl. Mask B: MHz MB Impl. Mask
---------- ----- ---- ---------- ----- ----
167 0.5 10 4.0
> PS: It might be interesting to see those numbers for 1.1 and current-cvs;
> David's rewrote should result in some improvements, I guess?
As mentioned in the other mail, half of SPECfp fails, and SPECint
only has modest improvements.
Those modest improvements will hopefully get much better one I
figure out what has caused Alpha's slow decline over the past
few months. Peak performance was in July, and we've lost about
two points since then.
r~