This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: pedantic

To: jason at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: pedantic
From: David L Nicol <david at kasey dot umkc dot edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 18:26:44 +0000
CC: egcs at cygnus dot com
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City network operations
References: <199811081904.LAA31358@yorick.cygnus.com> <199811082324.PAA22733@smtp.earthlink.net>

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> writes:
> 
>     Jason> I'd like to be able to set the pedantic_errors flag without
>     Jason> setting pedantic, so that code that is using gratuitously
>     Jason> erroneous code that we still know how to handle can be an
>     Jason> error, but strict standards conformance is not enforced.
>     Jason> Thoughts?

-Wall doesn't do it?  There are identifiable things to warn for that
-Wall cathces not but -pedantic will bail out on?  Sounds reasonable
to this armchair consultant; how about -Wpedantic?


______________________________________________________________________
 David Nicol 816.235.1187 UMKC Network Operations david@news.umkc.edu
  "they cannot truly imagine anyone creating anything genuinely new."

References:
- pedantic
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: pedantic
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]