This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: squangle transition hack



> > Here's an oddball idea I just came up with to ease the transition to
> > -fsquangle.
> 
> I'd rather like squangling to be an additional safeguard for ABI
> changes. Once we feel certain enough about the ABI changes, we should
> activate them together with squangling. Backward-compatibility is then
> a no-no, because the ABI has been changed.

The problem is that many assemblers cannot process the manglings generated
by 
	map<string,string>

because of limits on symbol lengths, so people are going to need
squangling before the new ABI is ready.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]