This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why does debugging "pure virtual method called" have to be sohard?
- To: law at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Why does debugging "pure virtual method called" have to be sohard?
- From: rich_paul at bigfoot dot com
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 18:49:37 -0500 (EST)
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: rich_paul at bigfoot dot com
For the record, I hereby declare the aformentioned patch to be trivial,
and in the public domain to boot ( not much value without gcc, anyway ).
Do with it as you will.
Regards,
Rich
--------
Where do you want to crash, toady?
On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>
> In message <Pine.SO4.4.05.9811031733390.17302-100000@impulse.nielsenmedia.com
> >you write:
> > BTW, is there anything I have to do besides saying 'I hereby disclaim my
> > copyright to the patch I just submitted' ( which I just said ) in order to
> > have it used?
> >
> > I suppose it wouldn't hurt to get a 'I don't own you' form from my
> > employer just for the record. What do y'all need?
> If the patches are non-trivial, then yes, there is more you have to do. Email
> or a statement from you to this effect is not sufficient.
>
> http://www.cygnus.com/egcs/contribute.html
>
> Jeff
>
> ps. I haven't looked at the patches, so I don't know if they qualify.
>
>