This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Static data members in template declarations

To: Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: Static data members in template declarations
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at dcc dot unicamp dot br>
Date: 02 Nov 1998 05:51:37 -200
Cc: mark at markmitchell dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com, stl at sgi dot com, libstdc++-v3 at cygnus dot com
References: <199811020050.QAA18401@smtp.earthlink.net> <or7lxe65xz.fsf@araguaia.dcc.unicamp.br> <u9emrmk1kn.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com>

On Nov  2, 1998, Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> wrote:

>>>>>> Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br> writes:
>> Within the scope of S<T>, `a', `S::a' and `S<T>::a' are all the same
>> thing

> Nope.  S::a and S<T>::a are the same, but they are dependent, and `a' is
> not.  g++ doesn't currently implement that consistently.

The point I was trying to make is that they *should* be the same
thing.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:oliva@gnu.org mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Static data members in template declarations
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- Static data members in template declarations
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Static data members in template declarations
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Static data members in template declarations
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]