This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
new x86/pic g++ eh regression.
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: new x86/pic g++ eh regression.
- From: Robert Lipe <robertl at dgii dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 09:53:45 -0500
About 10/16 or 10/17, we picked up several regressions with eh on x86
PIC. I've seen this on both SCO targets that I regularly test and have
verified it on a Linux system. You won't see the failure with the
default testing flags.
make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS="--tool_opts=-fPIC old-deja.exp=eh*"
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
Running /play/egcs/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/old-deja.exp ...
FAIL: g++.brendan/eh1.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh10.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh12.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh14.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh16.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh17.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh18.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh21.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh23.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh24.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh25.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh26.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh27.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh28.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh29.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh31.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh34.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh35.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh36.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh37.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh38.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh39.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh40.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh41.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh42.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh44.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh47.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh48.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh49.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh5.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh55.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh6.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh8.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 66
# of unexpected failures 38
The tests I ran on 1016 didn't show these failures. The ones on 1017
do show them. I often do the update/test ritual after midnight so the
dates may be off one from the obvious meaning.
RJL