This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sorry not implemented: address of bound pointer-to-member function
- To: mrs at wrs dot com (Mike Stump), jason at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: sorry not implemented: address of bound pointer-to-member function
- From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at dcc dot unicamp dot br>
- Date: 01 Oct 1998 00:12:58 -300
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com, peter at mcs dot nl, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com
- References: <199809291952.MAA13656@kankakee.wrs.com>
Mike Stump <mrs@wrs.com> writes:
>> Also could someone explain the exact meaning of this message to
>> me.
> Sure, a bound pointer-to-member function is a virtual member function
> that is associated with a concrete object.
Not necessarily a virtual member function; I think. It could be any
non-static member function.
> I suppose that with thunks such an extension is ill-advised, if
> someone wants to do up a patch to change the working into something
> like error ("ANSI C++ forbids ..."), that would clarify this thing.
Here's a patch. Jason, is this ok to install?
--
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil
bound-ptrmem.diff