Re: g++ failures --> libstdc++.so.2.9.0 ?

[Dominic Mitchell <dominic at cedep dot net>]

>>>>> "jal" == Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> writes:

jal>   In message <199809080640.CAA16652@Titan.net>you write:

jal> A "make install" should have installed libstdc++-2.9. 

Am I right to expect that the libstdc++-2.9 should have been located
by default in /usr/local/lib if the prefix variable had been set to
/usr/local ?  

jal>  However if will
jal> install an *archive* version of the library 
 Do you mean for example libstdc++.a ? If that is the case then if I
 want libstdc++.so.2.9.0 I would need to used the --enabled-shared option?

jal> And many systems will prefer a shared library over an archive library
jal> at link time.

Thus I would be  better off to recompile egcs with the --enabled-shared
option if I understand correctly.

Thanks 



-- 
==========================================================
Dominic Mitchell      Email: mitcheld@qed.econ.queensu.ca
Economic Department          mailto:dominic@cedep.net
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario      
Canada, K7L 3N3	      Running Linux Redhat 5.0	
==========================================================