This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Sat, 5 Sep 1998, Mumit Khan wrote: > +/* A bitfield declared as `int' forces `int' alignment for the struct. */ > +#undef PCC_BITFIELDS_TYPE_MATTERS > +#define PCC_BITFIELDS_TYPE_MATTERS 0 Is it only me who finds it misleading when the actual code results in a behavior that is exactly opposite to the one described in the comment, or is there something wrong here? / Kamil Iskra AmigaOS Linux/i386 Linux/m68k \ | GeekGadgets GCC maintainer UNIX system administrator | | iskra@student.uci.agh.edu.pl kiskra@ernie.icslab.agh.edu.pl | \ kamil@dwd.interkom.pl http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~iskra /
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |