This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-19980824: results on RHL 5.1/Intel
- To: chj at lin dot foa dot se (Christian Joensson FOA 72)
- Subject: Re: egcs-19980824: results on RHL 5.1/Intel
- From: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
>
>
> autoconf-2.12-3
> glibc-2.0.7-19
>
> gcc --version
> 2.7.2.3
>
> as --version
> GNU assembler 2.9.1
> Copyright 1997 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
> the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
> This assembler was configured for a target of `i686-pc-linux-gnu'.
>
> d --version
> GNU ld 2.9.1
> Copyright 1997 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
> the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
> Supported emulations:
> elf_i386
> i386linux
>
> dejagnu-980528 snapshot, ``locally'' compiled.
>
> FAIL: g++.jason/offset1.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.jason/offset2.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.jason/offset3.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.jason/offset4.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.jason/opeq.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.jason/opeq2.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.jason/opeq3.C no assignment semantics defined (test for errors, line 14)
> FAIL: g++.jason/opeq3.C (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: g++.pt/explicit69.C not a template instantiation (test for errors, line 2)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb77.C Execution test
Could you please out why those C++ tests failed? I got no C++ failures
on ReadHat 5.1/x86.
H.J.