This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: String class + Documentation Questions
- To: nbecker at fred dot net
- Subject: Re: String class + Documentation Questions
- From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 98 8:16:19 PDT
- Cc: jbuck at synopsys dot com, tv at pobox dot com, johnr at euler dot mcdata dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com
> What I'd like to see is a complex class that's more useful for
> numerical processing:
>
> 1) No default constructor (avoid wasting time initializing arrays)
> 2) Direct public access to .re and .im to ease porting of legacy code.
It is trivial to write one. But I don't understand your second point:
what large body of legacy code assumes complex values have accessible
.re and .im (and not .r and .i, .real and .imag, etc).?