This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: hpux10.20 XPASS regressions from g++-2.8.1 to egcs-19980803
- To: tprince at cat dot e-mail dot com
- Subject: Re: hpux10.20 XPASS regressions from g++-2.8.1 to egcs-19980803
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 20:08:33 -0600
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <199808171514.IAA28987@cygnus.com>you write:
>
> I had been discounting XPASS indications as possible
> regressions, however the ones in the following list achieved
> expected FAIL status with gcc-2.8.1 on hpux10.20 by returning ld
> status 1 and not executing, so these may be cases where only
> gcc-2.8.1succeeded and both egcs versions failed. I'm sure
> others have reported these by now. It took my HP box 6 hours
> real time to negotiate the gcc-2.8.1/g77-0.5.23 test.
Your message is almost impossible to decipher.
Please state explicitly what you compiler is showing the XPASS
message and which compiler is showing an XFAIL. Otherwise I can
do little with messages like this because I can not easily determine
what compilers got particular test results.
jeff
ps. I know what the 980506 stuff is (I wrote the test to expose
a very obscure problem in the new scheduler) and I will be checking
in a patch soon.