This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-1.1 status
- To: Cristian Gafton <gafton at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: egcs-1.1 status
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 16:34:30 +0200
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>, Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>, egcs at cygnus dot com
- References: <19980817230623.A6927@dot.cygnus.com>
At 08:11 18.08.98 , Cristian Gafton wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> Rebuilding the entire distribution with the new compiler is probably
>> one of the better tests it could go through. Hopefully, too, that's
>
>I'll give it a shot.
>
>> one of those things you can just throw cpu cycles at, and see that it
>> all Just Works. But if there are problems, we'll want to know about
>> them.
>
>Okay, so I have rpms for the snapshot on
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/home/gafton/testing/egcs
>for Intel, Alpha, Sparc. Those rpms _should_ work, but be aware that i
>configured them to remove any trace of gcc and/or egcs you had previously
>installed on Intel and Sparc. (ie after upgrading to those there will be
>no more combo gcc/egcs soup like RH 5.1)
>
>Hopefully I will be able to maintain those rpms in a reasonable turn
>around time.
How about RedHat contributing and maintaining a RPM-spec file in the
egcs/contrib dir?
And the people with slower connections like me, but with full egcs source
already would appreciate if you put a .nosrc.rpm into your ftp dir.
Franz.