Re: --without-local-prefix Does Not Work

[Vin Shelton <acs at alumni dot princeton dot edu>]

Jeff,
    If --without-local-prefix is no longer going to work, that's OK, but 
it represents a change in behavior.  As I mentioned, as recently as the 7/27 
snapshot it worked the way I expected, which was:
	--with-local-prefix=/foo/bar	- local includes are in /foo/bar
	--without-local-prefix		- don't default to any local includes
	or nothing, which was the same as --with-local-prefix=/usr/local.
I've been building --without-local-prefix for quite awhile.
Looking at configure, at a guess I think I can say --with-local-prefix=
"some-non-existant-path" to get the old behavior.

thanks,
  vin shelton

  In message <199808162235.SAA03053@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>I had written:
  > The configure option '--without-local-prefix' has not worked in either
  > of the 2 most recent snapshots, 08/03 or 08/16.  It worked successfully
  > on the 07/27 snapshot.  The gcc/Makefile generated from these snapshots
  > contains the following line:

law@hurl.cygnus.com said:
> The -local-prefix options are meant to be passed a pathname.  They are
> not yes/no options.