This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: m68k stuff
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Subject: Re: m68k stuff
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 16:14:19 -0600
- cc: Kate Hedstrom <kate at ahab dot rutgers dot edu>, egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <9808141908.AA07021@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>you write:
> Jeff, Kate,
>
> > Looking over the gcc test results for m68k-sun-sunos4.1,
> > I see one gcc regression. compile/950612-1.c.
>
> > I built a cross compiler for m68k-sun-sunos4.1 and tried
> > the test and it worked fine.
>
> That one doesn't fail over here [m68k-next-nextstep3], and hasn't
> failed for months.
Well, if it's generating:
addl a6@(-160),a6@(-132)
Then there's a bug since no such instruction exists on the 68k family
as far as I know (one the operands needs to be a register).
It may be the case that it's not generating that instruction for you
or that your assembler is incorrectly accepting it.
It is certainly generating that bogus instruction for me (now that
I know what to look for :-)
jeff