This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Need someone to look at a regression
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Need someone to look at a regression
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 00:19:37 -0600
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
gcc.dg/980626-1.c is consistently showing up as a regression when
comparing the egcs-1.1 against egcs-1.0.3a and gcc-2.8.1.
This is a test for a bogus warning.
Can someone look into why egcs-1.1 is behaving differently for this
test? Compile with -Wimplicit-int.
gcc-2.8.1 and egcs-1.0.3 will probably not issue any warnings (which
is the correct behavior IMHO). egcs-1.1 will issue a bogus warning.
Thanks!
int main()
{
typedef SFtype __attribute__ ((mode (SF)));
typedef DFtype __attribute__ ((mode (DF)));
typedef HItype __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
typedef SItype __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
typedef DItype __attribute__ ((mode (DI)));
typedef UHItype __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
typedef USItype __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
typedef UDItype __attribute__ ((mode (DI)));
return 0;
}