This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: patch to supress trailing missing initializer warnings
- To: Carlo Wood <carlo at runaway dot xs4all dot nl>
- Subject: Re: patch to supress trailing missing initializer warnings
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 23:42:45 -0600
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com (egcs at cygnus dot com)
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <199808060143.DAA03028@jolan.ppro>you write:
> I think that the situations in which you want a warning
> but wouldn't get one with case A (X) is much larger then
> the cases in which case B will give a warning while you
> don't really care much about a warning (Y) (Apart from
> the fact that it is better to give too much warnings in
> this case then too less).
>
> This shows that case B is *better*.
>
> Fuzzy ok, but still better.
Sorry. Fuzzy is not better in this case. In fact, in general fuzzy is not
better for egcs.
jeff