This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: patch to supress trailing missing initializer warnings



  In message <199808060143.DAA03028@jolan.ppro>you write:
  > I think that the situations in which you want a warning
  > but wouldn't get one with case A (X) is much larger then
  > the cases in which case B will give a warning while you
  > don't really care much about a warning (Y) (Apart from
  > the fact that it is better to give too much warnings in
  > this case then too less).
  > 
  > This shows that case B is *better*.
  > 
  > Fuzzy ok, but still better.
Sorry.  Fuzzy is not better in this case.  In fact, in general fuzzy is not
better for egcs.
jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]