This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: To -g or not to -g? (was: egcs build report)
- To: law at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: To -g or not to -g? (was: egcs build report)
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 22:36:40 +0200 (MET DST)
- cc: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, egcs at cygnus dot com, mark at markmitchell dot com, tomh at taz dot ccs dot fau dot edu
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>> (For 1.1 itself we could include a note on how to build without
>> debug symbols, but still have debuggable libraries, but not change
>> the code).
> Agreed.
Okay, but who'll do that? I'd really like to see that, but how exactly
can this -- binaries without debug symbols and libraries with debugging
information -- be done?
If anyone knows but doesn't want to update the docs, please give me a
hint and I'll do the HTML stuff...
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) Vienna University of Technology
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/