This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: miscellaneous nits in NetBSD configuration
- To: Todd Vierling <tv at pobox dot com>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: miscellaneous nits in NetBSD configuration
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>
- Date: 03 Aug 1998 12:32:51 -0700
- Cc: richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com, rearnsha at sun52 dot arm dot com
- References: <Pine.NEB.4.02.9808031504540.8088-100000@duhnet.net>
>>>>> Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com> writes:
> On 3 Aug 1998, Jason Merrill wrote:
> : > Not quite. It will only get defined if it is not already *and*
> : > INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX is defined. Code in final.c then checks whether
> : > DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO is defined or not, it does not check its value. For an
> : > a.out machine using stabs (eg netbsd/arm32), defining this to 0 or 1
> : > causes dwarf information to be sucked into the build.
> :
> : Yes, but it doesn't get used unless you say -fno-sjlj-exceptions. I don't
> : think it's a problem for the compiler to contain dwarf code that you don't
> : use.
> It's actually code that it "can't" use - not just "do[es]n't".
Yes, but who cares? So your compiler is a little larger. This doesn't
strike me as a significant issue.
Jason