This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: crash in 1.0.3a fortran compilation


[Sorry I replied to a quote of Mumit's previously and partly
duplicated his message before it got here...]

>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> writes:

 Jeff> For example, I've found spec92 to be quite useful both to judge
 Jeff> some performance issues *and* to track down code gen problems.

A little caution: I've never seen SPEC but comments someone sent me
after reporting a problem with it suggest that at least some spec92
Fortran is quite broken (not unexpected...).  The bit in question
seemed to have been extensively fixed in spec95, but...  You can
probably make it work as intended with appropriate g77 options, but
you'll take a performance hit which may be misleading.

There are some shorter free Fortran benchmarks we could deal with (as
well as the longer Livermore one Tim Prince as talked about) if
there's any interest.  Some of them also have C counterparts, which
might be relevant.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]