This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Power of the G++ test suite
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Power of the G++ test suite
- From: Ben Scherrey <scherrey at gte dot net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 16:43:05 -0400
- Organization: Proteus Technologies, Inc.
- References: <199807171942.UAA00792.cygnus.egcs@fm215.facility.pipex.com> <u9n2a7oxaj.fsf@yorick.cygnus.com>
- Reply-To: scherrey at proteus-tech dot com
FWIW I just check into it and Plum Hall charges $20K for their
testsuite!! I've got a small development shop and cannot justify $20K
(per suite, there's C++, the C++ Std Lib, and Java that we'd need =
$60K) to find out what aspects of our compilers aren't exactly like the
book wants it. Certainly we do test code in house for known (or
possiblly known) issues but building a more public version of these test
cases would be a great benifit.
later,
Ben Scherrey
Proteus Technologies, Inc.
Jason Merrill wrote:
> On the other hand, Cygnus already licenses the Plum Hall and Perennial C++
> testsuites, so we do have those results to call on. I've just been using
> the Plum Hall results to complete the g++ namespace implementation (which
> should now be quite solid).
>
> Unfortunately, we can't share these results with the net, due to licensing
> restrictions, and this is the first time I've done this sort of thing; I
> haven't had much time to sit down with the testsuite results and blow
> through a bunch of failures like this.
>
> Jason