Re: New STL implementation from SGI

[Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>]

  In message <35A19F9D.F5D3B9CC@gte.net>you write:
  > I'm not sure if I fully understand what we're talking about. Do you
  > mean integrating the latest STL for distribution or for use in actually
  > implementing the compiler?
No, integrating it for use by folks that use egcs.


  > 	I agree that bringing it in might not be warranted for internal use.
  > However, If we're talking about using it for distribution of the STL
  > library than I'd hope that it made it into 1.1 as everyone out there is
  > going to be trying to build it on their own anyway.
That's fine, they're welcome to try, but IMHO, it's unwise to try and
suck in a new STL release at this point.  Unless we want to push back
the release schedule again (which then runs the risk of hitting the
next Cygnus EOQ).

Getting the egcs-1.1 release out in August is still the target, if we
miss it, it's likely to fall into October due to Cygnus EOQ concerns.