This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: egcs 1.0.2 c++ .o size


	Is the 50% size penalty going to continue into the future? We have an
	exception emulation (setjmp/longjmp, keeping classes derived from "Cleanup"
	in a list) that we'd dearly like to get rid of, but 50% is a fairly steep
	price to pay.

Our first priority was just to get a reasonable non-setjmp mostly machine
independent EH mechanism working, and then worry about optimizing it later.

There have already been a few changes to development versions of GNU as that
help reduce the size of the EH info.  More optimizations are possible, but
I have no idea when people will get around to implementing them.

50% is a lot more executable size increase than I would expect to see on
a sparc target due to EH though.  It is possible that there is some other
problem here.

Jim


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]