This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Dwarf 1 or 2?
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Dwarf 1 or 2?
- From: mrs at wrs dot com (Mike Stump)
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:28:19 -0800
- Reply-To: egcs at cygnus dot com
> To: egcs@cygnus.com
> From: Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com>
> Date: 12 Dec 1997 15:28:13 -0800
> The dwarf 2 spec can be found in
> ftp://sgigate.sgi.com/pub/dwarf
> if anyone's interested in doing that work.
If one was going to switch to dwarf, what would be the better dwarf to
pick? Dwarf 1, or 2? I ask because quite a few different groups
(processor abi groups) seem to picking up dwarf 1, and no one seems to
be behind 2 (except Linux and sgi).
I'm interested in user experiences with dwarf 2 systems, (sparc v9
linux, iris6) with gdb and how well it holds up in relationship to
stabs.