Re: gcc 2.8.0 is broken on linux/x86

[hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)]

> 
> 
>   In message <m0xgM5x-0004ecC@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
>   > > Or, look into the possibility that other tests might expose the problem,
>   > > but which you can directly debug (I get the impression you can't debug th
>   > e
>   > > dynamic linker at this point in time).
>   > > 
>   > 
>   > I can debug the dynamic linker under linux 2.0.32. But it is hard
>   > to create a small test case. Ulrich will tell you that :-(. I will
>   > see what I can do.
> I'm not all that worried about a small testcase.  If you can point to
> hunk of code that's miscompiled and explain what's wrong with the assembly
> code I'm sure we'll be able to fix the problem.
> 
> jeff
> 

Here is the diff against dl-reloc.bad.s to generate a working
dl-reloc.s. It seems to work fine.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
---
--- dl-reloc.bad.s	Thu Dec 11 21:54:43 1997
+++ dl-reloc.fixed.s	Thu Dec 11 22:44:20 1997
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
 	addl -68(%ebp),%eax
 	movl (%ecx),%edx
 	movl -52(%ebp),%ecx
-	movl %eax,16(%ebp)
+	movl %eax,-24(%ebp)
 	movl (%ecx),%edi
 	movl -160(%ebp),%ecx
 	addl %edx,%edi
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
 	pushl %eax
 	leal -24(%ebp),%eax
 	pushl %eax
-	movl -24(%ebp),%eax
+	movl -80(%ebp),%eax
 	movl (%eax),%eax
 	addl -8(%ecx),%eax
 	pushl %eax
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@
 	movl -68(%ebp),%edx
 	sall $4,%eax
 	addl %eax,%edx
-	movl %edx,16(%ebp)
+	movl %edx,-24(%ebp)
 	xorl %eax,%eax
 	movb (%ecx),%al
 	cmpl $8,%eax
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@
 	addl -104(%ebp),%eax
 	movl (%ecx),%edx
 	movl -88(%ebp),%ecx
-	movl %eax,16(%ebp)
+	movl %eax,-24(%ebp)
 	movl (%ecx),%edi
 	movl -152(%ebp),%ecx
 	addl %edx,%edi
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@
 	pushl %eax
 	leal -24(%ebp),%eax
 	pushl %eax
-	movl -24(%ebp),%eax
+	movl -116(%ebp),%eax
 	movl (%eax),%eax
 	addl -8(%ecx),%eax
 	pushl %eax
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@
 	movl -104(%ebp),%edx
 	sall $4,%eax
 	addl %eax,%edx
-	movl %edx,16(%ebp)
+	movl %edx,-24(%ebp)
 	xorl %eax,%eax
 	movb (%ecx),%al
 	cmpl $8,%eax