This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A glibc or egcs bug?
- To: Neal Becker <neal at ctd dot comsat dot com>
- Subject: Re: A glibc or egcs bug?
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at ipd dot info dot uni-karlsruhe dot de>
- Date: 07 Dec 1997 18:31:56 +0100
- Cc: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu), egcs at cygnus dot com, libc-linux at gnu dot org (GNU C Library)
- References: <m0xeXHc-0004ecC@ocean.lucon.org> <u9n2iddrd4.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
- Reply-To: drepper at ipd dot info dot uni-karlsruhe dot de (Ulrich Drepper)
Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:
> The related question is, why are we hitting this union wait stuff at
> all, if we don't ask for -D_BSD? I thought glibc would favor POSIX in
> cases of conflict. Using the old BSD union wait is hardly ever
> needed.
We have the feature of the transparent unions, so why not use it. It
is much cleaner than requiring defines.
-- Uli
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. Rubensstrasse 5
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ 76149 Karlsruhe/Germany
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------