This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Continued: egcs-971201: testsuite results for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com, law at cygnus dot com, jason at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Continued: egcs-971201: testsuite results for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
- From: Max Lawson <mlawson at drfmc dot ceng dot cea dot fr>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 14:46:25 +0100
> From jason@cygnus.com Wed Dec 3 03:09 MET 1997
>
> >>>>> Max Lawson <mlawson@drfmc.ceng.cea.fr> writes:
>
> > $g++ -Wall -O test.cc
> > test.cc: In function `int main()':
> > test.cc:10: virtual memory exhausted
>
> As I said before, you need to add -Wno-return-type or the old memory
> explosion bug resurfaces. This is a known bug. The problem is that
> save_for_inline_copying wastes a ridiculous amount of memory in the
> presence of recursive function definitions, which you get with templates.
> With -Wno-return-type, we don't need to use save_for_inline_copying.
I do not need to use any warning flag to obtain memory explosion. The
-Wno-return-type flag indeed solve the posted testcase problem, but can't
help.
I am now aware that my problem is mentioned in the first part of the online
faq (subject: virtual memory error). But what's called a large file ? And
how to simplify files ? In order to use template one has to merge header and
source files ....
Thanx for the answers, Max.