This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Typename5.C failure i386-linux-gnulibc1 [Re: egcs-971127: testsuiteresults on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1]
- To: Mumit Khan <khan at xraylith dot wisc dot edu>
- Subject: Re: Typename5.C failure i386-linux-gnulibc1 [Re: egcs-971127: testsuiteresults on i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1]
- From: Robert Lipe <robertl at dgii dot com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 13:31:43 -0600
- Cc: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>, egcs at cygnus dot com, Max Lawson <mlawson at drfmc dot ceng dot cea dot fr>
- References: <199712011512.QAA18311@mururoa.inria.fr> <Pine.HPP.3.96.971201125146.15682A-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
> > From the other reports I see, you seem more to be the exception than
> > the average case or maybe your are the only one with RH4.1 which seems
>
> for the results from Peter Schmid, posted on Nov. 29. He also does not see
> the failure for typename5.C that you see. Max Lawson's message that shows
Perhaps there's some sort of slippery x86 thing going on here, becuase
typename5.C fails on i586-pc-sco3.2v5.0.4, too. See:
http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs/1997-Nov/0950.html
Interestingly, it seems to be a recent failure.
$ grep typename5.C */*.sum
coff-971123/g++.sum:PASS: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors)
coff-971129/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors)
elf-971123/g++.sum:PASS: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors)
elf-971129/g++.sum:FAIL: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors)