This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
egcs-971127 i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 "make check" results
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: egcs-971127 i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1 "make check" results
- From: Jeff Epler <jepler at inetnebr dot com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 08:05:38 -0600
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 40
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4883
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
=== g++ tests ===
FAIL: g++.eh/spec2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh44.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh5.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.pt/typename5.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3392
# of unexpected failures 8
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 82
# of untested testcases 6
=== g77 tests ===
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 130
# of unexpected failures 2
It has been suggested elsewhere that having LD_LIBRARY_PATH set before
execution of the tests could cause some of these failures, so I'm
executing the test again with LD_LIBRARY_PATH unset.
I used standard ./configure, no BOOT_CFLAGS or anything else odd.
I did "make bootstrap" and then "make check". The initial gcc was
egcs-971016.
Jeff
--
\/ jepler@inetnebr.com http://www.auburn.net/~errancy/ (0|1(01*0)*1)+
If God didn't mean for us to juggle, tennis balls wouldn't come three
to a can.