This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Linux, PowerPC and -fvtable-thunks
- To: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Subject: Re: Linux, PowerPC and -fvtable-thunks
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 00:09:19 -0800
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <m0xZAFG-0004eeC@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
> If I were asked directly about that patch, I would have
> explained it. But I thought it was quite obvious that
> --enable-shared would include the seond config file on
> many platforms.
I asked you directly about that patch. Shall I go back and find the message
and provide an exact quote?
> One more thing, will there be a libstdc++ 2.8 for gcc
> 2.8? If the answer is yes, $(CC) should be used for
> making libstdc++.so in libstdc++/Makefile.in, instead
> of $(CXX).
I don't know if there will be a libstdc++2.8
BTW, the problem you're referring to has been fixed. I fixed it a few
days ago.
> I am not sure if it is a good idea. I tend to think it may
> cause more trouble than my old patch. The problem happens
> when you have more than one config files. In my case, it
> is --enable-shared. You don't want linuxpic if --enable-shared
> is not used. To do it right, you should support multiple
> config files.
Doesn't matter. Your patch is _far_ too intrusive to go in at this time;
if you want this problem fixed, find a less intrusive way to address the
problem.
Jeff