This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-971105 config.guess and gcc/config.guess have diverged
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: egcs-971105 config.guess and gcc/config.guess have diverged
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 12:09:35 -0700
- cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, wilson at cygnus dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <19971112150154.29821@dot.cygnus.com>you write:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 1997 at 04:48:23PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > I don't think the problem is, as you imply above, that support
> > is missing. The issue is that ev5* support is there and broken. At
> > least I couldn't bootstrap my ev5 with egcs out of the box.
>
> It's not ev5 thats the problem but ev56 (since it is ev5's that I have),
> almost certainly caused by the relatively untested byte-word extension.
>
> We should probably not enable MASK_BYTE_OPS by default in configure.in
> until we've got it fixed.
Kaveh -- can you try removing MASK_BYTE_OPS in gcc/{configure,configure,in}
for the alpha56 target, then try to bootstrap the ev56?
If that works we can use it for the release; for the mainline we've already
sucked in the work from ev56 work from the FSF tree.
jeff