971105/Red Hat 4.2/intel results

[Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>]

Here are the results I get using Red Hat 4.2 plus the gas from
binutils 2.8.1.0.15.  If I also use the ld from the same binutils
versions, all the gcc failures go away (the problem with "int glob;"
vanishes).

Summary of tests for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
Red Hat 4.2 +  
GNU assembler version 970731, using BFD version linux-2.8.1.0.15

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fin
line-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fin
line-functions -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution,  -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fin
line-functions -funroll-all-loops 

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            4877
# of unexpected failures        6
# of expected failures          5
# of unsupported tests          7

(As I said, with the newer ld all the above failures go away).

                === g++ tests ===

FAIL: g++.benjamin/warn01.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.jason/template31.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C  Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh23.C  Execution test

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            3378
# of unexpected failures        3
# of unexpected successes       3
# of expected failures          79
# of untested testcases         6

All g77, libio, and libstdc++ tests pass.