This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
(971023) Addendum: i386-linux-gnulibc1 g++ test results
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: (971023) Addendum: i386-linux-gnulibc1 g++ test results
- From: Mumit Khan <khan at xraylith dot wisc dot edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 23:27:41 -0500
I had written earlier regarding 39 unexpected failures for g++:
> Platform: i386-linux-gnulibc1 (libc 5.3.12)
> Configure args: --enable-shared
>
> g++ note:
> Note the EH failures. The problem that I had reported for 971016
> still exists; basically -fexceptions don't work, but -fsjlj-exceptions
> do work. Interesting that HJ Lu reported that he doesn't see the EH
> failures using 5.4.(something) libc.
>
> fyi, the same EH problem and work-around on i386-cygwin32, so I'm
> inclined to believe it has nothing to do with the libc version.
I just re-ran the test cases substituting -fexceptions with
-fsjlj-exceptions, and here're the results:
=== g++ tests ===
Running /scratch/src/egcs/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/old-deja.exp ...
FAIL: g++.benjamin/warn01.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.jason/template31.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/eh35.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3372
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 81
# of untested testcases 10
/scratch/src/egcs-971023/LINUX/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.90.14 971023 (gcc2-970802 experimental)
Much better.
Regards,
Mumit -- khan@xraylith.wisc.edu
http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/