This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: exception handling poll


On Thu, 16 Oct 1997, Richard Henderson wrote:

> A little poll for those that have been complaining about 
> exception handling frame unwind info being included for C:
> 
>   Assuming the .eh_frame section is completely read-only, at what
>   eh/text ratio would you find it acceptible that that information
>   is always there?
> 
> Can you live with 10%?  8?  5?  3?

I can no longer contain myself:

0%. (Well, maybe a tiny bit more then that.)

I use g++ for embedded targets, and I have spent much effort getting
executable sizes down. Exception handling would be really nice, but
x% costs real hardware, and real money. And prices are not linear, either.

Don't forget us embedded people, please:-)

-- 
Steve Williams
steve@icarus.com
steve@picturel.com

"The woods are lovely, dark and deep.  But I have promises to keep,
And lines to code before I sleep, And lines to code before I sleep."




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]