This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Cygnus Supported GCC vs. EGCS GCC
- To: Neal Becker <neal at ctd dot comsat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Cygnus Supported GCC vs. EGCS GCC
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 22:05:28 -0600
- cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>, frichard at bbn dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com, jvs at bbn dot com, asolomon at bbn dot com, kpowers at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <u9zpob6al2.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>you write:
> >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com> writes:
>
>
> Jim> The new haifa-scheduler should help here. Did you try using --ena
> ble-haifa?
>
> Really? Isn't haifa enabled by default?
Only on the PA right now.
First, haifa problably won't help too much without retuning the scheduling
parameters. I did this for the PA, and I think someone submitted them
for the sparc, but did so after we went into a "slush" (as opposed to
a "freeze" :-)
Second, we really haven't beat on haifa as much on other targets yet --
though that's improved over the last several weeks with folks reporting
with & without haifa test results.
jeff