This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-971008: results on i586-linux-gnulibc1 haifa disabled
On Sat, 11 October 1997, 13:36:09, hjl@lucon.org wrote:
>
> Stock egcs-971008 with the following patches applied:
>
> [8]: fix for tstring.cc from H.J. Lu.
This patch is not necessary.
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh10.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh16.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh17.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh2.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh23.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh25.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh29.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh3.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh35.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh39.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh40.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh41.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh42.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh44.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh5.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C Execution test
> FAIL: g++.mike/eh6.C Execution test
I don't have so many EH failures. But I have this patch installed.
H.J.
---
Thu Oct 2 12:41:44 1997 H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.ai.mit.edu)
* except.c (expand_exception_blocks): Inhibit deferred pop
in the exception handler.
[patch deleted]
Thanks, just tried it, but it doesn't make any difference; numbers
remain the same:
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3356
# of unexpected failures 24
# of expected failures 80
# of untested testcases 6
You must be using another patch that makes the difference.
--
Manfred Hollstein If you have any questions about GNU software:
Hindenburgstr. 13/1 <mailto:manfred@s-direktnet.de>
75446 Wiernsheim, FRG <http://www.s-direktnet.de/HomePages/manfred/>
PGP key: <http://www.s-direktnet.de/HomePages/manfred/manfred.asc>