This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for 4.3.0 20080125 (experimental) (GCC) testsuite on i386-unknown-openbsd4.2
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc at vinc17 dot org>
- To: "Dongsheng Song" <dongsheng dot song at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:44:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: Results for 4.3.0 20080125 (experimental) (GCC) testsuite on i386-unknown-openbsd4.2
- References: <20080130171541.GA6641@ob.g11n.org> <4b3406f0801301959x17dafebcgbc3b5a389fee3ade@mail.gmail.com>
On 2008-01-31 11:59:32 +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> - mpfr_inits2 (prec, m1, m2, NULL);
> + mpfr_inits2 (prec, m1, m2, (char *)NULL);
Is there any reason to use (char *) instead of (void *)?
Note that m1 and m2 are MPFR pointers (mpfr_ptr type, which is in
the reality __mpfr_struct * but that's internal).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)