This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 3.1 20010313 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin
- To: "'gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: Results for 3.1 20010313 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin
- From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 03:35:43 -0000
win2k sp1 & cygwin1.dll 20010312 snapshot
libgcj disabled
g++ testsuite incomplete
Native configuration is i686-pc-cygwin
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: conpr-1.C
FAIL: conpr-2a.o
FAIL: conpr-3a.o
FAIL: g++.abi/cxa_vec.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash20.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.eh/rethrow1.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/rethrow2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/rethrow4.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/rethrow6.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.ext/initp1.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate2.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate3.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 13)
XPASS: g++.ext/instantiate3.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/template18.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/template18.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.jason/thunk2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/ctors6.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/cvt2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/operators4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/eh30.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3128
# of unexpected failures 24
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 24
# of untested testcases 6
/usr/local/obj/gcc-m/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.1 20010313
(experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g77.f-torture/compile/20000629-1.f, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops
XPASS: g77.f-torture/compile/20000629-1.f, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -O2
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -O3 -g
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -Os
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 926
# of unexpected successes 8
# of expected failures 1
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000807-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000904-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20001009-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20001117-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/990213-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/990214-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-fs-1.c scan-assembler-not \\*_bar
FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-fs-1.c scan-assembler-not \\*_baz
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 15089
# of unexpected failures 12
# of expected failures 93
# of unsupported tests 25
/usr/local/obj/gcc-m/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010313 (experimental)
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-5.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/protocol.m compilation, -O
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 140
# of unexpected failures 3
# of untested testcases 3
/usr/local/obj/gcc-m/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010313 (experimental)
Compiler version: 3.1 20010313 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-cygwin
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-cygwin
Counting all warnings,
there are 216 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
32 gcc/gcc.c
29 gcc/combine.c
27 gcc/config/i386/winnt.c
20 gcc/cppinit.c
16 gcc/varasm.c
6 gcc/java/jcf-parse.c
6 gcc/cse.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/java/jcf-path.c
5 gcc/dwarf2out.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
4 gcc/reg-stack.c
4 gcc/cp/call.c
4 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
4 gcc/collect2.c
3 gcc/reload1.c
3 gcc/java/jvspec.c
3 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
2 insn-emit.c
2 hashtab.c
2 gcc/reload.c
2 gcc/java/jcf-io.c
2 gcc/function.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/expr.c
2 gcc/dwarf2asm.c
2 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
2 gcc/alias.c
1 insn-output.c
1 gcc/toplev.c
1 gcc/sdbout.c
1 gcc/sched-deps.c
1 gcc/resource.c
1 gcc/regmove.c
1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/java/verify.c
1 gcc/java/mangle.c
1 gcc/final.c
1 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/cp/init.c
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
Number of warning types:
56 comparison between signed and unsigned
29 function \`???' was previously declared within a block
22 implicit declaration of function \`???'
17 unused variable \`???'
16 function declaration isn't a prototype
13 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
9 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89
compilers are required to support
8 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
5 passing arg ??? of \`???' discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
5 comparison between pointer and integer
5 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
3 traditional C rejects string concatenation
2 unused parameter \`???'
2 suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
2 passing arg ??? of \`???' from incompatible pointer type
2 initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2 destination missing a mode?
2 assignment of read-only location
1 return discards qualifiers from pointer target type
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
1 integer constant is unsigned in ISO C, signed with -traditional
1 initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
1 decimal constant is so large that it is unsigned
1 control reaches end of non-void function
1 \`???' defined but not used