This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 3.0 20010305 (prerelease) testsuite on mips-sgi-irix6.3
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Results for 3.0 20010305 (prerelease) testsuite on mips-sgi-irix6.3
- From: oliva at donald dot dcc dot unicamp dot br (Oliva Alexandre)
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 07:12:08 -0300
Native configuration is mips-sgi-irix6.3
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 2
# of unresolved testcases 2
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.benjamin/15071.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/copy9.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash15.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash20.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash30.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash38.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash49.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash62.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/cvt1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/err-msg3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/nest21.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.brendan/ptolemy2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.jason/template24.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.jason/template31.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/thunk3.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/thunk3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.jason/typeid1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/arg1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/arg8.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/arm12.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/arm9.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/bad-error7.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/code-gen5.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/ctors10.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/ctors12.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/ctors13.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/ctors17.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/ctors6.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/cvt16.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/cvt2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/cvt7.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/missed-error2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/nest3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/operators32.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/operators4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/vbase1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/virtual3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility10.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility13.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility17.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility22.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility25.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/visibility7.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.martin/bitset1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/net46.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/p658.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/rtti1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/crash31.C parse error (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.other/crash31.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/defarg6.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/headers1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/inline14.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/static11.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb109.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb113.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb124.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb127.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb132.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb15.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb21.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb24.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb30.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb31.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb33.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb39.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb41.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb42.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb44.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb46.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb54.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb55.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb60.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb66.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb73.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb77.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb79.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6291
# of unexpected failures 80
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 120
# of untested testcases 19
/tmp/egcs/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.0 20010305 (prerelease)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/20000629-1.f, -O3 -g
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/20000511-2.f, -O3 -g
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/19981119-0.f compilation, -O3 -g
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f execution, -Os
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 914
# of unexpected failures 4
# of untested testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 8
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -Os
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O0
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O1
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O2
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c sequence point warning (test for warnings, line 59)
FAIL: linkage.c
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/mg.c
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 14936
# of unexpected failures 29
# of unexpected successes 4
# of expected failures 89
# of unsupported tests 56
/tmp/egcs/gcc/xgcc version 3.0 20010305 (prerelease)
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-1.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-10.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-11.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-12.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-13.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-14.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-15.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-16.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-17.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-18.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-19.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-2.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-20.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-3.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-4.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-5.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-6.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-7.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-8.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-9.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bycopy-1.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bycopy-2.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/bycopy-3.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/fdecl.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/np-1.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/np-2.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/paste.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/protocol.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/string1.m execution, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/string2.m execution, -O
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 29
# of unexpected failures 30
# of untested testcases 1
/tmp/egcs/gcc/xgcc version 3.0 20010305 (prerelease)
Compiler version: 3.0 20010305 (prerelease)
Platform: mips-sgi-irix6.3
BOOT_CFLAGS: -g -O9 -W -Wall
Counting all warnings,
there are 228 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
84 gcc/gcc.c
27 gcc/combine.c
23 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
18 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
10 gcc/config/mips/mips.md
9 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
9 gcc/config/mips/mips.c
6 gcc/cse.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/expr.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
4 gcc/reload1.c
4 gcc/cp/call.c
2 hashtab.c
2 gcc/reload.c
2 gcc/function.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/alias.c
1 gcc/sched-deps.c
1 gcc/regmove.c
1 gcc/libgcc2.c
1 gcc/intl/dcgettext.c
1 gcc/final.c
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
1 gcc/cp/decl.c
Number of warning types:
62 missing initializer
62 (near initialization for `???')
50 comparison between signed and unsigned
12 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
10 string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
10 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
6 operand 1 missing mode?
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
4 operand 0 missing mode?
2 function declaration isn't a prototype
1 suggest not using #elif in traditional C
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
1 integer constant is unsigned in ISO C, signed with -traditional
1 decimal constant is so large that it is unsigned
1 alignment of `???' is greater than maximum object file alignment. Using 8.
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me