This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for 2.97 20001205 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-redhat-linux-gnu
- To: Franz Sirl <fsirl at entropy dot crashing dot org>
- Subject: Re: Results for 2.97 20001205 (experimental) testsuite on powerpc-redhat-linux-gnu
- From: Neil Booth <neilb at earthling dot net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:22:03 +0000
- Cc: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200012052224.PAA21983@entropy.crashing.org>
Franz Sirl wrote:-
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad2.c test w/o predicate (test for errors, line 10)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad2.c test punctuation (test for errors, line 13)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad2.c (test for errors, line 13)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad2.c test number (test for errors, line 16)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad2.c (test for errors, line 16)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad2.c bad syntax (test for errors, line 23)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad2.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assert_trad3.c (test for excess errors)
That's odd, I don't get these. Deja vu <g>. Any ideas?
Neil.