This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/10862: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 May 2003 14:51:18 -0000
- Subject: Re: optimization/10862: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->law
Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 19 14:51:18 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Jeff, you had been doing the tree-ssa C++ stuff, right? Or
is there someone else whom I could bother?
Besides, apart from this one and 10863 (which triggers
_really_ frequent on my code), the tree-ssa branch seems
to be in pretty good shape -- thanks!
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10862