This is the mail archive of the
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/10700: 3.2/3.3: ICE on alpha while building libquicktime
- From: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
- To: nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
- Date: 10 May 2003 00:56:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: target/10700: 3.2/3.3: ICE on alpha while building libquicktime
- Reply-to: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
The following reply was made to PR target/10700; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: target/10700: 3.2/3.3: ICE on alpha while building libquicktime
Date: 10 May 2003 02:55:32 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR?10700
There's some problem with this tree (on ia64):
<mult_expr 0x2000000000349fb0
type <integer_type 0x20000000002ec750 int SI
size <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8930 constant 32>
unit size <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8a80 constant 4>
align 32 symtab 0 alias set 3 precision 32 min <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8a20 -2147483648> max <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8a50 2147483647>
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x2000000000316630>>
arg 0 <truth_or_expr 0x2000000000349f50
type <integer_type 0x20000000002ec9c0 long unsigned int unsigned DI
size <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8ab0 constant 64>
unit size <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8c00 constant 8>
align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 precision 64 min <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8c90 0> max <integer_cst 0x20000000002e8cc0 18446744073709551615>>
arg 0 <eq_expr 0x2000000000349bf0 type <integer_type 0x20000000002ec9c0 long unsigned int>
arg 0 <parm_decl 0x20000000003852b0 block>
arg 1 <integer_cst 0x2000000000349bc0 constant 1>>
arg 1 <eq_expr 0x2000000000349c50 type <integer_type 0x20000000002ec9c0 long unsigned int>
arg 0 <parm_decl 0x20000000003852b0 block>
arg 1 <integer_cst 0x2000000000349c20 constant 3>>>
arg 1 <integer_cst 0x2000000000349b90 type <integer_type 0x20000000002ec750 int> constant 8>>
expand_mult eventually gets passed (reg:DI XXX) and (const_int 8) and
doesn't like the result mode being different from arg0's mode. I'm not
sure whether it is supposed to. Also, shouldn't the type of eq_expr
and truth_or_expr always be int? Maybe somebody more knowledgeable can
comment on this...
--
Falk